The first question that the man who believes in God must do same God to him would have to be how you are your God mine. Enséñame as you are your so that it can amarte and comprenderte.

From where come the concepts of the different doctrines on the essence from the Deity, the Elohim, Yahweh, YHWH, Yahshua or Yeshua? Messianic Jews and Jews, Christian Catholics and Protestant Christians differ. We speak of the unique and true God de Deuteronomio 6:4, the famous oration of the Jewish town: Shemá, Israel: Adonai Eloheinu, Adonai Ejad. Israel hears: Yahweh our God, Yahweh one is. Visible and invisible the one that has created the universe, we spoke of the God that is provided the universal salvation of the man, the man of all race and all time, not by its own merits, but by the mercy of this unique God, and in this end up agreeing all the believers who know the Word God she clearly as much says because it in the Old one as in the New Testament, and that Word is the Son of God, Juan 1. However, God takes to the man to its Son Jesus Christ whom the victory has conquered on the physical and spiritual death for us in the cross of the Calvary. If we create and we received the Son of God, we have eternal life, and the Son of to God takes the Father, because He is the God Door, the God Way, and the life, our spiritual bread of every day. … The one that has the Son has the life… they 1Juan.

The Bible indeed deals with the relation between God and we, in her many look for the salvation, but it is the one that speaks of the Son of God: Juan 5:39. This he is one of the versicles with which we began. All the believers in Jesus and the believers in the Bible we agree, or we would have at least to be it, in which the Spirit of God, the Spirit of Christ and He Spirit Santo are the same Spirit. Multitude of doctrines and different interpretations have be used like weapon by devil that is expert in to complicate it everything so that we do not understand the things of God, to divide to body of Christ in different denominations, churches, sects and cults, which God allows so that those that do not come to God with a humble and unconditional heart, those that do not follow the Word of God that is the own Son of God, do not discern the things of the Gentleman. … so that seeing, they see and they do not perceive; and oyendo, hears and they do not understand; so that they do not become, and the sins are pardoned them… Marks 4:12 but this because there is to be thus, because the man is so hard of heart? ; we found it the answer in the love, in the called love charity, in the charity not to give alms, that also are necessary, but in the charity that the dictionary defines as love of God, love nonpretended and of a nature superior, love even by the enemies, which éramos we in our sins before regreting, to change to us of mind, and by us died Christ. All the wisdom can be had, to speak in angelical languages, can be made miracles, be revived deads, be in a wonderful church, but we do not have love of God, nothing we are. … By to its you will know them fruits… Mateo 7:16, and the fruit of the Spirit is the love, joy, peace… love of God that comes from us of our heart, of our new inner man, as 5:22 explains us Pablo in Gálatas.

The doctrine of the Trinidad began to settle down like official after several councils that began by the hand of an external leader to the Church like was Constantino when it managed to reunite in Nicea to all the high representatives of the Christian churches from Rome to Alexandria. In this council one struggled and finally it condemned the arrianismo that it promulgated that Christ was not eternal, but creature created by the Father. With Scriptures in the hand, it can be folding, as well as simple to demonstrate with them His eternity and Its paper of Creator, etc. it can read it in the Biblical Study JESUS CHRIST. In this also we agree, or we would have to be it all the Cristiandad; those that are inspired by the Bible and by the Spirit Santo, whose unction we learn all the things, so that takes us truth to all and is He who interprets Scriptures. Only some sects do not recognize the eternity of the Son of God, like the witnesses. But the question of greater division is the one than it exhibits to the Spirit Santo like another “person� different from the Father and the Son, but not only this, but some sects do not consider as excellent Spirit as to the Father, or to the Son, they deny His personal deal with the believer and they reduce to a mere force, or power to it of God, writing in small letters the word spirit when it talks about to the one of God.

The Bible soon exposes the major and unforgivable sin to us that is the blasphemy against the Spirit Santo. In the Sagradas Scriptures, we can with versicles of several books, in case our personal testimony is not accepted, demonstrate the personal treatment that we have the Christians with the Spirit in the same way Santo since we are born again by the faith in Christ, who the Son of God has, because the Spirit Santo is in us, of which we are born, who intercede by moaned us “… with unspeakable…� takes, us to all the truth, gives the unction us and teaches to us, etc. can be contristar to him. In short, we are dealing personally with the Spirit of God. God is Spirit, and the Spirit is the Truth.

We would have to be all in agreement in which the Spirit Santo, with Whom we dealt all along is the own Spirit of God Father who is Spirit and who is omnipresent. And we return from all the versicle to which we have seen at the outset: … Because the Gentleman is the Spirit, and where he is the Spirit of God, there is freedom there: 2Coríntios 3:17. We have then freedom in declaring what would have to be showed by all the cristiandad: That God has pronounced to the man through Its Son Jesus Christ, and has baptized to us with, and in, Its Spirit Santo. The Spirit Santo is in the heart of each believer who is it really, bringing in addition to the temple to our soul and our spirit to God Father, and to Jesus Christ, the Son of God, in Spirit, because… the one that has the Son, has the life… they 1Juan 5:12… No can come, if the Father whom he sent to me to not brings him; and I will revive to him in the rearward day… Juan 6:44. … the one that eats my meat and drinks my blood, has eternal life; and I will revive to him in the rearward day… Juan 6:54… As he sent the living Father to me, and I live by the Father, also the one who eats to me, he also will live by me. Juan 4:57. … The Spirit is the one that gives life; the meat for anything is useful; the words that I have spoken to you are spirit and are life. Juan God 6:63 then, in His infinity, can be personally in all the believers at the same time by His Spirit who gives the spiritual life us having believed in His unigénito Son, Jesus Christ.

A good departure point could be this important versicle of Apocalypse where Jesus Christ defines itself to itself:

… I am the Alpha and the Omega, principle and aim, says the Gentleman, the one that is and that was, and that is to come, the Almighty… Apocalypse 1:8.

The history of Doctrina of the Trinidad leaves already of the Apostles in germ, and their disciples from the first century. Writings as the Didajé of year 100 already showed the faith in the three people of the Trinidad for the Baptism. In a brief presentation of the history of the ecumenical Christian councils after the third century, we will be able to see the conclusions at which they arrived, and because one concluded with the stabilization of the different doctrines, many of them previous and taught by the Apostles and their disciples.

 

HISTORY OF THE COUNCILS

All the old of the churches for the discussion of the doctrine supervision and, council meeting of the work of the Church, after Jerusalem, they will serve to us like the accumulation of historical decisions that the church of Rome and the Orthodox one would take in doctrinal matter, as much in the doctrines that are of the Sagradas Scriptures and which they have remained until today in all the churches like are it the Creeds, as well as those that are not it and can be considered clearly like heresies. Until the rupture of the Great Schism between Rome and Ortodoxos, the councils can be denominated ecumenical because all the denominational churches of the time participated. The five councils of Letran, both of Lyons, the one of Vienna, Basel, Constanza, the one of Trento for contrarreforma, and both Vatican mainly, are only of the church of Rome. We only relate the excellent ones as far as doctrine, the rest was internal battles by the papal succession and the government of the church between the church of France and the one of Rome that would end at the Schism of the West that would divide the Catholic church in two factions, who later would reconcile. In addition other three Orthodox councils of scholastic nature also exist.

I Nicea 325 d.C. Being Constantino emperor in pontificado of Wild the sentence of the arrianismo was determined that preaches that the Son of God is a noneternal creature of the Father, reason why this council concludes with the doctrine of which the Verb, or Word of God is true Son of God, of the same substance that Father, and therefore eternal and true God. Doctrina of the Trinidad, that or was part of the Church from before the councils, was taught or from the origins of the Christianity. Disciples like Policarpo de Izmir, disciple of Juan, martyr in 155 d.C. Justino, Apolonio or Ireneo, taught already it, but it was Tertuliano (155-230) his more defending faithful, although Teófilo of Antioch was first in using the term “Trias� to define the Trinidad. Later, already in the succession of the councils, it would be defended by Atanasio that later would be bishop of Alexandria. To the learned being in Scriptures, and with the influence of the disciples mentioned before, it was the one who the doctrine documented before the council, that in addition added “the consubstantial� word to define what today we know like Atanasio Creed, or I create Niceno or of Nicea that we will also see.

I Constantinople 381 d.C. The patriarch of this city admitted the divinity of Christ but she said that the Spirit was creature of the Father who ministraba the gifts of God, which was in opposition to the education of the Bible, the Apostles and the own believers; Therefore in this council the divinity of the Spirit is clear, like true God, and it determines like equal to the Son and the Father. Another patriarch determined that the Verb could not be in Jesus man, nevertheless in this council was admitted that yes it was it and was been part of the doctrine. The call was the conclusion of this council Atanasio Creed or últma version of the first Creed of the Apostles who also we will see, and that it finally included the person of the Spirit as same God and completed the previous Niceno Creed.

In the following text we see what the testimony of the Spirit is denominated:

… This he is Jesus Christ, who came by means of water and blood; not by means of water only, but by means of water and blood. And the Spirit is the one that gives testimony; because the Spirit is the truth. 7Porque three is those that give testimony in the sky: the Father, the Verb and the Spirit Santo; and these three are one. 8Y three is those that give Earth testimony: the Spirit, the water and the blood; and these three agree. 9Si we received the testimony of the men, major is the testimony of God; because this it is the testimony whereupon God has testified about its Son. 10El that believes in the Son of God, has the testimony in itself; the one that God does not create, him has made lying, because it has not believed in the testimony that God has given about its Son. 11Y this is the testimony: that God has given eternal life us; and this life is in its Son. 12El that has the Son, has the life; the one that does not have the Son of God does not have the life. 5 1Juan.

Indeed three are those that give testimony: The Spirit who make us be born again, the water because we baptized ourselves being immersed in the mind of Christ, and in its Spirit, and thirdly the blood, this one of Christ who has been spilled for pardon of our sins and granting of the eternal life.

Hipona 393 d.C. That it was celebrated in different dates, to which Agustín would go, it served to define the canon of the Bible according to the Catholic Church. In this case they would consider some books canonical that the Jews did not include in which Tanakh, First Testatmento or Antiguo is called Testament. At that time the Septuaginta, or version in Greek of a.T included those that today are considered books apocryphal so that they showed opposite doctrines the truth, at times of deviation of Israel and not inspired. For this reason the Jews do not include them. The Protestant Bibles do not include them, and follow, since made Lutero the landlord approved by Escribas of Israel, who better to know it! than they call 24 books, that we disturb in 39, to that we added 27 of the New Testament. Therefore a Catholic Bible has 73 books and one Protestant 66 normally. The most remarkable reason for apocryphal texts is the doctrine of zoroástrico origin of purgatorio of the souls and the system of practice or sale of indulgences that is reflected in 2Macabéos. As they will include/understand, an opposite doctrine to the Gospel does not deserve to be in the Word of God, reason why this and other books must be relegated to simple historical or sapienciales books.

Éfeso 431 d.C. One defined the unit of person in Christ, the Son of God and the man Jesus de Nazaret. Nestorio de Constantinople defended that from Maria the Christ or Ungido but nonGod was born Jesus, which was considered heresy and the Church by previous conviction of San Cirilo of Alexandria promulgated the doctrine of which Maria was the mother of God. Official beginning of the cult to Maria. From here what was pagan in Morning call, one would become Christian in Maria, the goddess mother for the new disciples of the empire. This doctrinal error would mean that God did not exist before, which is not correct, because as much the Father as the Son is ether to us. The case is that the spirit of the council was to demonstrate that Jesus who was born from Maria was at the same time Jesus and God.

II Constantinople 553 d.C. The patriarch of this city preaches the call monotelismo that consists in denying that in Christ there are two wills, the one of God and the one of man, which returned to contradict Scriptures and therefore was argued and addition to the characteristics of the Son.

III Constantinople 680 d.C. Constantino IV gives back the capital from the empire to Constantinople and summons east council that would be a continuity of defense of the previous doctrines and fights against which they thought or they defended some of the calls heresies. The Pope of Rome was neither in this, for obvious reasons nor in many others, but a representation went.

 

II Nicea 787 d.C would be the following council where the use would remember icons and the cult to the images for “facilitating the meditation and as symbol of the presence of santo or virgin at issue� to which it stops to confuse would call icons, against clearly of the Sagradas Scriptures, the Ten Orders, Exodus 20,… you will not become image, nor sculpture… … you will not incline to them you will honor nor them…

 

Constanza 1413 d.C. Making Gallic of the papal practice of the murder which you were not put under its heresies of the time, which is of course a practical antichrist, was condemned Hans Hus, Christian reformer. This was the form to celebrate the election of the new Pope and to solve the Great Schism of the West. The call of this council was with the aim of solving the situation to have three Popes that excomulgaban themselves among them. Gregorio XII of Rome, and Benedicto XIII in Avignon, did not accept to third Alexander V so that it stayed as unique Pope. Of this form they denied the council authority. Finally they appointed Martin V, who would not either accept the council authority on the one of Pope. One moved again to soothes of Rome that were ruined, and whose reconstruction it was dedicated.

 

Trento 1563 d.C. Its beginning went the reaction to the protestant reform, besides the necessity to put some order in the scandalous life of papado during centuries and to put the doctrine in sequence Catholic. In the relation of conclusions, besides approving all the previously accepted one in the councils, it would be added that not only the tradition of the church for them was revelation source but the Sagradas Scriptures. The character of true sacrifice, the transubstanciación is constituted in the sacrament to eucaristía, according to which the bread becomes body of Christ and the wine in blood of real Christ in matter to the being consecrated by the priest, which is in opposition to the doctrine of Christ,… a single time by the sins… Hebrew 9:28. Sacrament of the marriage. Confirmation of purgatorio, indoctrinates this anti-Biblical, to read Lucas 16:19 to the 31. On the other hand the Vulgata was accepted, to the Latin, like accepted translation. The penance and extreme unction settle down. The elaboration of the catechism is become ordained.

 

The Vatican I 1869 d.C. This council not concluded according to the Vatican, but in him authority established that it gave him to Pope that until now it had had to agree with the old ones, would denominate “infalibilidad papal�, by that the Pope could at the moments at which cathedra� by special revelation spoke “Ex- of the Gentleman, for pronouncing itself in doctrine subjects and authority and would not be questioned.

 

The Vatican II 1965 d.C. Juan XXIII making use of the recent called authority papal infalibilidad, summoned for surprise and satisfaction of the church and the Catholic faithfuls. In 1950 with the same papal infalibilidad Pio XII he defined the assumption of the Virgin, who in addition in this council acquires character of mediator, opposite lawyer and other heresies to the Scriptures Saints. The liturgy in common languages of the countries, or vernacular was authorized, not only in Latin. The versions of the Bible to the common languages are authorized. Besides the council declarations and decrees it is in the four formulated constitutions is main the doctrinal structure, calls:

Dei Verbum on the Divine revelation of the Scriptures that is set out like of equal value that the tradition, which goes against the words of Christ in Marks 7:7.

Gentium lumen on the Church and its character and composition and relation, where the relations of the same with other nonCatholic Christians and other religions are exposed, of which says that they do not close the way of the salvation if their faithfuls look for God sincerely. From you intone the Church of Rome proclaims the religious ecumenicalism, not only within the Christianity (all religion is worth) that is that according to the Vatican II no longer is essential Jesus Christ to be safe, and its expiatoria death for the salvation. The tolerance of religion, condition and race, but the message of Christ only for the Christians, instead of to take it to the other nations, as Christ commanded, although also insist to it, would have to declare what the Gospel de Christ says: … the one that believes in the Son of God has eternal life, the one that does not create already has been condemned…. All religion is valid according to the Vatican II to be safe before God. You judge same the entailment of this Church with Christ. In addition he exhibits a section to the declaration on the Virgin Maria like mediator and lawyer, another doctrine missed, not only before the New Testament, but before the history of the Church.

Sacrosactum Concilium on reform of liturgy and sacraments, in that emphasis does in presence of Christ in the same through Eucaristía by transubstanciación either commented before, when the Gentleman says there that… where there are two or three, there I will be I…, but this doctrine only exists from Trento, which makes that during 1500 years it has not existed, not therefore Santa Cena who the Christians we celebrated from that one Passover in which it established our Mr. Jesus Christ. In the section on the language of the liturgy it is taught to adapt the liturgy to the mentality and traditions of the towns; without commentary.

Gaudium ET Spes finally is a declaration of the church in relation to the present world, correct enaltecimiento of the marriage as it bases of the society, the relation of the man with the sin and its freedom to love God and to obey to him for salvation, the promotion of the culture, the mutual aid and other principles of bring back to consciousness Christian in the society, the policy and with the nature that is creation of God. All the texts are had in the Web Vatican.va

The Council the Vatican II was really summoned in the spirit to update and to make more open to the church in its relation with the faithfuls and who these implied more in their Christian life. Despite this it shows that the Church that car is described as Catholic does not have a permanent doctrine, therefore cannot display Catholic, and that in each council has “to adapt itself� to the heresies and to the doctrinal errors that have maintained during centuries. On the contrary the Bible continues being the same, does not change, therefore this is the definitive test that the tradition cannot be base of the Church and the Verb of alive God if. They do well then, those that follow the Verb and not the ecclesiastical human structure.

 

The Vatican is city been within Italy, from the pacts of Letrán, which confers to the Pope sovereignty in this state. Other errors were corrected with the centuries like the acceptance of the nonexistence of the limb or the recognition of the work of Copérnico, and of which the inquisición “santa� ordered to torture and to burn, and so many other false doctrines that there are to eliminate in each and every one of the churches so that it is the Church, and if no, it is necessary to leave them. Peculiarly the Catholic Church that before condemned to Copérnico and others, in science subjects, recently has been pronounced in favor of the education of the Evolution of Darwin, as it forms in whom God has created.

 

As we can verify has not been easy in the history of the Catholic church to define the essence of our God, nor the doctrine of the Church, but is much more easy when the tradition is not put in front to the Word of God, which have made the old Catholics who are to their church which Sanhedrin went to the Jews to which it exhorts Mr. Jesus Christ in Marks 7… asked to Him, then, the fariseos you write and them: Why your disciples do not walk according to the tradition of the old ones, but they eat bread with impure hands? 6Respondiendo he, said to them: Hypocrites, prophesied of you Isaiah well, as she is written: This town of lips me honor, But its heart is far from me. 7 Then in vain they honor, teaching like doctrines orders to me of men. 8Porque leaving the order of God, you cling to the tradition of the men.
 

These councils, the Vatican I and II give like result the present catechism that includes doctrinal errors that are founded on the opposite tradition of men to Scriptures; what we could denominate a reinvención of the Sanhedrin that found the Gentleman when it came to the temple it does almost two thousand years, and then already it noticed the Apostles to them saying: … that was necessary to the Son of the Man to suffer much, and to be rejected by the old ones, the main priests and you write by them… Marks 8:31. We do not do the same, but we obey the Word of God.

In this first part then, we have verified that the correct knowledge of the person of God has been as important as to congregate to the old ones of the churches of all the geography where they lived, from Rome to Alexandria in those times in which to travel for an event of this nature, supposed in some cases weeks of trip.

For us it must be equally important, but more, meet our Gentleman and Salvador, to the husband with whom we will live by the eternity, to That one that we are hoping in His second coming to establish His kingdom. Despite the spiritual intimate relation of each believer with God will have to prevail in love and, but the bases are fundamental for the true knowledge of God.

In the second part of this study we will review concepts like the legal person, legal term to identify a company, or society in which although there are from one two or more partners, before the law a joint-stock company, limited or of another nature, is known like legal person, a single person who can have many partners or people; in this association of people, the spirit is the same and the approach as the intention of the project is guided by a same mind to which all are faithful.

In addition we will see the similarity between the composition of the water and the essence of God, or the behavior of the wind, the light and the fire and the similarity and the use of these terms by the Gentleman to be spoken of the Spirit in all the Bible.

Like waiting room of the second part and after to have studied the excellent councils on the essence of God, I recommend to them that they officially read in any Catholic, Protestant or Evangelical encyclopedia the final text of definition of the Trinidad today the call Niceno creed and of the declaration of Atanasio in the 333.